A free Threads post analyzer that scores your post against 2,572 real Threads posts, shows it in Threads' feed, and reads any post's numbers from its link.
5.0(1 rating)Write a post or paste a link to one. You see it in Threads' feed, scored by a model trained on 2,572 real Threads posts, and checked part by part.
Your post
How it looks on Threads
Post: photo, picture, name and badge
The score
What the posts say
On 198 accounts it never saw, the post with the higher score got more likes 58% of the time, in 5,057 pairs with a clear winner. A coin flip gets half, so use the score to pick between versions you like. Where the data comes from · It reads English posts.
Make it better
What you write stays in this browser, and the score runs on your device. A link is read on my server, and only the post and its numbers come back.
This free Threads post analyzer scores your post with a model trained on 2,572 real Threads posts from 218 accounts.
Write a post or paste a link to one. You see it in Threads' own feed, on a real post or on your own account, with the parts that helped or hurt in real posts. A link also gets its real numbers against the account's typical post.
Here's what a Threads post analyzer is, how the score works, what 2,572 Threads posts show, and how to write posts that beat your own usual.
What is a Threads post analyzer?
A Threads post analyzer checks a post before you post it, or after, and shows what to change.
Most score against rules someone wrote, or ask an AI to guess. This one scores against what won: posts from the same account, posted within 30 days of each other, where one got at least twice the likes of the other.
How the score works
The analyzer measures 25 parts of your post: its first line, its length, numbers, lists, "I" and "you", links, hashtags, mentions, pictures and more.
A model weighs each part by how often it won those matchups. Your score says where your post lands among all 2,572: 70 means it beats 70% of them.
How accurate it is
I tested it 5 times. Each time the model learned from 4 in 5 of the 198 accounts and was graded on the fifth, which it never saw, so every account was graded once.
Across those tests, the post it scored higher got more likes 58% of the time, in 5,057 pairs where one post got at least twice the other's likes. A coin flip gets 50%.
That's a hint, not a promise. The topic, the timing and the picture itself aren't in the score, and they matter more than the wording.
What 2,572 Threads posts show
In pairs of posts from the same account, where one got at least twice the likes, this is how often the post with each part won:
- Won
- 63%
- Pairs
- 1,298
- Won
- 60%
- Pairs
- 480
- Won
- 57%
- Pairs
- 104
- Won
- 57%
- Pairs
- 1,457
- Won
- 46%
- Pairs
- 2,053
- Won
- 44%
- Pairs
- 685
- Won
- 43%
- Pairs
- 1,231
- Won
- 40%
- Pairs
- 618
- Won
- 38%
- Pairs
- 554
- Won
- 38%
- Pairs
- 1,024
- Won
- 37%
- Pairs
- 1,125
- Won
- 37%
- Pairs
- 1,376
- Won
- 36%
- Pairs
- 380
- Won
- 26%
- Pairs
- 416
- Won
- 15%
- Pairs
- 158
The biggest winners: a photo (63%), a first line ending in a colon (60%) and a thread mark (57%). The biggest losers: a quote of another post (15%), a link (26%) and a hashtag (36%).
How long a Threads post can be
- Limit
- 500 characters
- Source
- Threads' own docs
The Threads character counter counts it the way Threads does.
Read any post from its link
Paste a link to any public Threads post, yours or anyone's, and the analyzer reads it for you: the text, the picture, the likes, replies, reposts and quotes.
Then it reads the account's latest posts and compares. "4.1× this account's typical post" means the post got 4.1 times the median likes of the account's recent posts.
That's the honest version of a virality score: not a guess about the wording, but how the post actually did against the account's own normal.
How to write posts that beat your usual
Here's what won most often in the data:
- Add a picture. A photo or a screenshot stops the scroll. Posts with it won 63% of 1,298 pairs.
- End the first line with a colon. "Here's how I do it:" pulls people into the rest. Posts with it won 60% of 480 pairs.
And what lost:
- Post your own take instead of quoting. Posts that quote another post won only 15% of 158 pairs.
- Put the link in a reply. Posts with a link won only 26% of 416 pairs.
- Skip the hashtags. Posts with a hashtag won only 36% of 380 pairs.
- Make a statement. Posts with a question won only 37% of 1,376 pairs.
Then post, and let your own numbers decide. Paste the link back in after a few days to see how it did against your usual.
The Art and Business of Online Writing
by Nicolas Cole
The Art and Business of Online Writing by Nicolas Cole reveals how to write compelling content, grow an audience.
I may earn a commission if you make a purchase, at no additional cost to you.

Where the data comes from
I read the latest public posts of 218 Threads accounts: creators from my creator directory, the creators in my research feed, and well-known creators in business, writing, AI, health and money. My own accounts are left out.
Replies, reposts and posts under 3 days old are left out too, because their numbers are still growing. That left 2,572 posts.
The model learned from pairs of posts by the same account within 30 days, so the audience was the same and the wording was the difference. Each account was graded by a version of the model that never saw it. The posts themselves stay private: only the model's weights and counts are published.
Ready to post it?
Or post it from your AI with my open source MCP servers and CLIs
Threads Post Analyzer FAQs
Questions about the Threads post analyzer? Here's what to know.
A Threads post analyzer checks a post and shows what helps or hurts it.
This one scores against 2,572 real Threads posts, not rules someone wrote.
It measures 25 parts of the post, like the first line, numbers, lists, links and pictures.
A model trained on pairs of posts from the same account weighs each part.
On 198 accounts it never saw, the post it scored higher got more likes 58% of the time, in 5,057 clear pairs.
A coin flip gets 50%, so use it to pick between versions you like.
In the data, posts did better with a photo (63%), a first line ending in a colon (60%) and a thread mark (57%).
They did worse with a quote of another post (15%), a link (26%) and a hashtag (36%).
In the data, a post with a link won only 26% of 416 pairs against a post from the same account without one.
Put the link in a reply instead.
Yes, paste a link to any public Threads post.
The Threads post analyzer reads its numbers and compares them with the account's recent posts.
Yes, paste your Threads link or username under the card and it pulls your photo and name.
You can also set them by hand.
Yes, the Threads post analyzer is free, with no sign-up.
The score runs on your device.
What you write stays in your browser, so it's there when you come back.
A link is read on my server, and only the post and its numbers come back.
Navid.me is reader-supported. When you buy through links on this site, I may earn an affiliate commission. Learn more.
More free tools
The most actionable AI newsletter for founders
Every week, get proven AI strategies, curated tools, and step-by-step systems to grow your audience, create better content, and build a profitable creator business.
No fluff, no filler, no BS. Just five minutes each week that might level up your online business and life.
P.S. Sign up now to get free access to my ultimate AI tools guide for creators.





















